[VL2006] - 75: Hear me better (HD Voice)

Tue Aug 18 22:17:30 EDT 2009

VL on VoIP <www.viewsletter.com>

*
CAN  YOU  HEAR  ME  (BETTER)  NOW?*

by William Flanagan

For at least its first 100 years, the telephone was limited in its audio
bandwidth very deliberately.  There were technical reasons to cut off
the low frequency response well above the frequency of A.C. power
lines--and even the second and third harmonics of 60 Hertz (Hz, Cycles
per second).   Long stretches of phone wire running in parallel with
power lines would pick up hum.  At the high frequency end, cost was a
factor--why make a high fidelity speaker when the human voice conveyed
most information at around 1000 Hz.  

Early analog multiplexing settled on 4 kHz of carrier bandwidth per
channel, some of which was devoted to guard bands and signaling.  The
usable audio channel came out to be roughly 3,000 Hz, 300 to 3,300 Hz.  

When voice was digitized in the 1960's, it happened entirely within "the
Phone Company" which used it for transmission between central offices. 
All the analog telephones and switches remained in place.  Early digital
electronics were rather primitive by today's practices.  Extrapolate
Moore's Law backwards from the average CPU now--for 40 years--and see
what you get.  So the digital channel copied the analog channel
bandwidth to define a circuit-switched 64 kbit/s bit stream (the DS-0). 
The encoding method, still, is Pulse Code Modulation (PCM) as described
in ITU Recommendation G.711.  We know that in our sleep, right?

What not so many know is that as far back as 1988, the ITU (then CCITT)
published a recommendation (G.722) for 7 kHz audio coding.  Twenty years
after PCM, the capabilities of electronics could step up to the
task--still within a DS-0 of course because that's how calls were set up.  

The DS-0 was rigid.  If you wanted to send some data with the voice
call, you would have to alter the coding of voice to reduce the bit rate
and make room for a data channel inside the DS-0.  OK, we can do that. 
So G.722 offered a variable bit rate voice coder that adapted by
trimming off some of the high end response when needed to accommodate
data.   

At the start, I said that most of the information in a voice is carried
at frequencies around 1 kHz.  Most, but not all.  The higher frequencies
lend realism, clarity, warmth, and other good stuff to the sound.   A
broader spectrum makes it easier for listeners to recognize voices.  You
can see the effects from a demonstration
<http://www.audiocodes.com/solutions/hdvoip> on the web site of Audio
Codes, G.711 vs. 7 kHz.

Meanwhile, back at VoIP, what does this have to do with the price of
beer?  Just that we enjoy huge processing power, huge bandwidth, and
freedom from the constraints of the fixed channels in time division
multiplexing.  We can mix voice and data (and video, and IM, and ....)
quite freely.  We can encode voice at any bit rate we want.

If desired, there's no reason we can't build Hi Fi audio equipment for
telephone calls.  In most IP phones, the audio components are capable of
frequencies well above 7 kHz just because it's modern technology.  Even
if the outside world insists on G.711 coding, we can use "high
definition audio" within our organizations--processing power to perform
transcoding at gateways is cheap (relatively) and lots of vendors know
how to do it.  Gigabit Ethernet on a LAN doesn't break a sweat handling
dozens of HD calls while we all merrily browse, download, and connect
thin clients to apps in the cloud.

Oddly, a key driver for HD voice seems to be the increasing use of video
conferencing.  The old "head in a barrel" telephone sound doesn't fit
well with today's real-time video images.  The whole experience of
"remote presence" is a better package when the sound quality is higher. 
Apparently, AT&T learned this lesson when test users of the early video
telephone perceived an increase in image quality when it was the sound
that was improved.

If you are planning for LAN capacity to include voice, the impact of HD
voice won't be huge.  Better encoding methods for 7 kHz voice take about
the same number of bits as PCM.  When the approximately 40% extra for
layers of protocol headers is added, the difference might be ignorable. 
Signaling is the same regardless of sound quality.

If you can't hear me better now, you probably will in the near future.
__

*How Can Flanagan Consulting Help You?*
  We understand not only the technology of networks, but also
  the surrounding business processes:  procurement, bid
  preparation/analysis, statements of work, financial analysis,
  consensus building around a solution, and more.
*  Find out now:  call +1.703.242.8381*  or email
*Bill at Flanagan-Consulting.com <mailto:Bill at Flanagan-Consulting.com>*
___
*Flanagan Consulting Supports Litigation Professionals*
Several associates are experienced in analysis of patents, trademarks,
contracts, and other intellectual property related to IT and
communications.
We have assisted attorneys preparing claims, depositions, and testimony.
How can we help you?  Queries to +1.703.242.8381.
___
/*Advertise Here*/
/To reach over two thousand interesting people in Telecom and IT./
/For details, //call the Publisher at +1.703.855.0191 /
*__*
*Responses to /ViewsLetter/ and Subscriptions*
Mailman, the Linux application, keeps the mailing list.  You
can unsubscribe or subscribe at:
http://lists.viewsletter.com/mailman/listinfo/vl2006
NOTE:  Migration of the mailing list to a new server required a
temporary change
in the list name.  If subscription changes are unavailable,  please try
again later
or email the publisher.
    You will need a password to unsubscribe, but Mailman
    will send you one on request.

Mail is welcome when addressed to publisher at viewsletter.com
<mailto:publisher at viewsletter.com>.
Because of the number of 'out of office' autoreplies, replies to
this message are discarded.
__
*Special thanks* for supporting ViewsLetter to www.webtorials.com
<http://www.webtorials.com/>*,*
your best source for communications tutorials and white papers.

-- 
Flanagan Consulting 	
	*In Converged Networking
We Have the Experience*

3800 Concorde Parkway, Suite 1500, Chantilly, VA,  USA
Ph: +1.703.242.8381 Fx: +1.703.242.8391
*www.Flanagan-Consulting.com*
/Flanagan Consulting is a Service Mark of W. A. Flanagan, Inc. /

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance."
--George Bernard Shaw

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.viewsletter.com/pipermail/vl2006/attachments/20090818/e7e214d0/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: VLvoipTinyLogo.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8614 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.viewsletter.com/pipermail/vl2006/attachments/20090818/e7e214d0/attachment.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6431 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.viewsletter.com/pipermail/vl2006/attachments/20090818/e7e214d0/attachment.jpe 